[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130723074505.GA15255@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 09:45:05 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH -tip/x86/jumplabel] x86: call out into int3 handler
directly instead of using notifier
* Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> (2013/07/23 6:00), Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> >
> >> What is the baseline for this patch?
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > it's x86/jumplabel branch, as a followup to commit
> > fd4363fff3d96 ("x86: Introduce int3 (breakpoint)-based instruction
> > patching") sitting there.
>
> AFAICS, tip/master already merged Jiri's works on tip/x86/jumplabel.
> Thus both branches need this. (especially, since this is actual
> bugfix, it should go into tip/master.)
I resolved it yesterday by keeping the kprobes patches in perf/core - just
forgot to push it all out.
I've pushed it out now, so perf/core should be a baseline: it merges in
x86/jumplabel and then applies the kprobes patches (historically in
perf/core).
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists