[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-1e40c2edef2537f87f94d0baf80aeaeb7d51cc23@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 00:46:20 -0700
From: tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
davidlohr.bueso@...com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, riel@...hat.com,
dhowells@...hat.com, Waiman.Long@...com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:core/locking] mutex: Fix/
document access-once assumption in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()
Commit-ID: 1e40c2edef2537f87f94d0baf80aeaeb7d51cc23
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1e40c2edef2537f87f94d0baf80aeaeb7d51cc23
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
AuthorDate: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 20:31:01 +0200
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:33:39 +0200
mutex: Fix/document access-once assumption in mutex_can_spin_on_owner()
mutex_can_spin_on_owner() is technically broken in that it would
in theory allow the compiler to load lock->owner twice, seeing a
pointer first time and a NULL pointer the second time.
Linus pointed out that a compiler has to be seriously broken to
not compile this correctly - but nevertheless this change
is correct as it will better document the implementation.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
Acked-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130719183101.GA20909@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/mutex.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/mutex.c b/kernel/mutex.c
index ff05f4b..7ff48c5 100644
--- a/kernel/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/mutex.c
@@ -209,11 +209,13 @@ int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
*/
static inline int mutex_can_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock)
{
+ struct task_struct *owner;
int retval = 1;
rcu_read_lock();
- if (lock->owner)
- retval = lock->owner->on_cpu;
+ owner = ACCESS_ONCE(lock->owner);
+ if (owner)
+ retval = owner->on_cpu;
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* if lock->owner is not set, the mutex owner may have just acquired
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists