[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374540283.3356.115.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 20:44:43 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Alexander Z Lam <azl@...gle.com>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] tracing: Introduce trace_create_cpu_file() and
tracing_get_cpu()
On Mon, 2013-07-22 at 19:15 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Otherwise, you might want to fix them if you need
> > to send a follow up patch set.
>
> Yes, will do.
>
After applying your patches, my tests crashed the kernel. It's fixed
with the following update. I guess you should merge this into your next
version.
-- Steve
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
index 5e5ff44..db561b5 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
@@ -2984,7 +2984,7 @@ static int tracing_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct trace_array *tr = inode->i_private;
struct seq_file *m = file->private_data;
- struct trace_iterator *iter = m->private;
+ struct trace_iterator *iter;
int cpu;
if (!(file->f_mode & FMODE_READ)) {
@@ -2992,6 +2992,9 @@ static int tracing_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
return 0;
}
+ /* Writes do not use seq_file */
+ iter = m->private;
+
mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
for_each_tracing_cpu(cpu) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists