[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130723092516.GC6846@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:25:16 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 12/16] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: remove device tree
parsing for cpu nodes
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 12:32:23PM +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:
> From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
>
> Now that the cpu device registration initialises the of_node(if available)
> appropriately for all the cpus, parsing here is redundant.
>
> This patch removes all DT parsing and uses cpu->of_node instead.
>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@....com>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> index c233ea6..25ac2cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/kirkwood-cpufreq.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> -#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <asm/proc-fns.h>
> @@ -175,9 +175,11 @@ static int kirkwood_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (IS_ERR(priv.base))
> return PTR_ERR(priv.base);
>
> - np = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus/cpu@0");
> - if (!np)
> + np = of_cpu_device_node_get(0);
> + if (!np) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get cpu device node\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> + }
>
> priv.cpu_clk = of_clk_get_by_name(np, "cpu_clk");
> if (IS_ERR(priv.cpu_clk)) {
> --
> 1.8.1.2
Hi Sudeep
I've not had chance to test it, but it looks O.K.
Acked-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists