linux-kernel - Re: Performance regression from switching lock to rw-sem for anon-vma tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130723095306.GA26174@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:53:06 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, "Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>,
	"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@...el.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: Performance regression from switching lock to rw-sem for
 anon-vma tree


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:45:13AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > Why not just try the delayed addition approach first? The spinning is 
> > time limited AFAICS, so we don't _have to_ recognize those as writers 
> > per se, only if the spinning fails and it wants to go on the waitlist. 
> > Am I missing something?
> > 
> > It will change patterns, it might even change the fairness balance - 
> > but is a legit change otherwise, especially if it helps performance.
> 
> Be very careful here. Some people (XFS) have very specific needs. Walken 
> and dchinner had a longish discussion on this a while back.

Agreed - yet it's worth at least trying it out the quick way, to see the 
main effect and to see whether that explains the performance assymetry and 
invest more effort into it.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/