[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51EE97BD.4050402@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:48:29 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
CC: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"gleb@...hat.com" <gleb@...hat.com>,
"pbonzini@...hat.com" <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: properly handle kvm emulation of hyperv
On 07/23/2013 06:55 AM, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
> This strategy of hypervisor detection based on some detection order IMHO is not
> a robust detection strategy. The current scheme works since the only hypervisor emulated
> (by other hypervisors happens to be Hyper-V). What if this were to change.
>
One strategy would be to pick the *last* one in the CPUID list, since
the ones before it are logically the one(s) being emulated...
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists