[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130723145419.GA12065@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 07:54:19 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/13] ACPI/IPMI: Fix potential response buffer overflow
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 04:08:59PM +0800, Lv Zheng wrote:
> This patch enhances sanity checks on message size to avoid potential buffer
> overflow.
>
> The kernel IPMI message size is IPMI_MAX_MSG_LENGTH(272 bytes) while the
> ACPI specification defined IPMI message size is 64 bytes. The difference
> is not handled by the original codes. This may cause crash in the response
> handling codes.
> This patch fixes this gap and also combines rx_data/tx_data to use single
> data/len pair since they need not be seperated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
<formletter>
This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
for how to do this properly.
</formletter>
Same goes for the other patches you sent in this thread...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists