[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADZ9YHgdK86MuGk7QcsYt+pRZpJ7GYG-rUWf77p9jWZvkw+i5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 22:09:00 +0600
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] sched: update_top_cache_domain only at the times of
building sched domain.
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 09:44:17PM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>> Currently, update_top_cache_domain() is called whenever schedule domain is built or destroyed. But, the following
>> callpath shows that they're at the same callpath and can be avoided update_top_cache_domain() while destroying schedule
>> domain and update only at the times of building schedule domains.
>>
>> partition_sched_domains()
>> detach_destroy_domain()
>> cpu_attach_domain()
>> update_top_cache_domain()
>> build_sched_domains()
>> cpu_attach_domain()
>> update_top_cache_domain()
>>
>
> Does it really matter?
Why should we do it twice? More importantly at the time of destroying
even though we know it'll be built again just few moment later.
>
>
> This just makes the code uglier for no gain afaict.
>
> If you really need to do this, key off @sd == NULL or something.
Sorry, would you please a bit more clearer? I can't pick what you're suggesting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists