linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH, RFC] sched: update_top_cache_domain only at the times of building sched domain.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130723165319.GC27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:53:19 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc:	mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] sched: update_top_cache_domain only at the times of
 building sched domain.

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 10:20:20PM +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:

> You mean using sd == NULL rather than using update_cache_domain variable ?

Yes, note how:

@@ -6109,7 +6110,7 @@ static void detach_destroy_domains(const struct cpumask *cpu_map)

        rcu_read_lock();
        for_each_cpu(i, cpu_map)
-               cpu_attach_domain(NULL, &def_root_domain, i);
        rcu_read_unlock();
 }

Always has NULL for sd? Which means you can do:

@@ -5138,7 +5138,8 @@ cpu_attach_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, struct root_domain *rd, int cpu)
        rcu_assign_pointer(rq->sd, sd);
        destroy_sched_domains(tmp, cpu);

-       update_top_cache_domain(cpu);
+       if (sd)
+               update_top_cache_domain(cpu);
 }

 /* cpus with isolated domains */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/