[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374603875.3436.149.camel@dvhart-mobl1.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 11:24:35 -0700
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
To: Michael Leun <lkml20130126@...ton.leun.net>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@...omium.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-nfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 3.11-rc regression bisected: s2disk does not work (was Re:
[PATCH v3 13/16] futex: use freezable blocking call)
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 20:08 +0200, Michael Leun wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:55:58 -0700
> Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Michael Leun
> > <lkml20130126@...ton.leun.net> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 6 May 2013 16:50:18 -0700
> > > Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Avoid waking up every thread sleeping in a futex_wait call during
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > With 3.11-rc s2disk from suspend-utils stopped working: Frozen at
> > > displaying 0% of saving image to disk.
> > >
> > > echo "1" >/sys/power/state still works.
> > >
> > > Bisecting yielded 88c8004fd3a5fdd2378069de86b90b21110d33a4,
> > > reverting that from 3.11-rc2 makes s2disk working again.
> > >
> >
> > I think the expanded use of the freezable_* helpers is exposing an
> > existing bug in hibernation. The SNAPSHOT_FREEZE ioctl calls
> > freeze_processes(), which sets the global system_freezing_cnt and
> > pm_freezing. try_to_freeze_tasks then sends every process except
> > current a signal which causes them all to end up in the refrigerator.
> > The current task then returns back to userspace and continues its work
> > to suspend to disk. If that task ever hits a call to try_to_freeze()
> > in the kernel, it will see system_freezing_cnt and pm_freezing=true
> > and freeze, and suspend to disk will hang forever. It could hit
> > try_to_freeze() because of a signal delivered to the task, or from
> > calling any syscall that uses a freezable_* helper like the one I
> > added to sys_futex.
> >
> > I think the right solution is to add a flag to the freezing task that
> > marks it unfreezable. I think PF_NOFREEZE would work, although it is
> > normally used on kernel threads, can you see if the attached patch
> > helps?
>
> That patch helps.
>
> BTW, the only machine I can reproduce this bug with is an i7-3630QM
> notebook. Cannot reproduce on an Core Duo U1400 and cannot reproduce on
> an i7 M 620.
>
> Are the sysreq backtraces still wanted? If so, any tip, how I could get
> them saved?
Typically by setting up a serial console or a netconsole and saving the
log from the attached terminal emulator (such as screen or minicom).
Is this what you are asking?
--
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center
Yocto Project - Linux Kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists