lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOS58YPynQ-QBx5nZEnYrP5kGTVvv9VAj0cV0aYeikTitvTQbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Jul 2013 14:50:22 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] devices cgroup: allow can_attach() if ns_capable

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com> wrote:
> This doesn't delegate it into the container.  It allows me, on the host,
> to set the cgroup for a container.

Hmmm? I'm a bit confused. Isn't the description saying that the patch
allows pseudo-root in userns to change cgroup membership even if it
isn't actually root?

Besides, I find the whole check rather bogus and would actually much
prefer just nuking the check and just follow the standard permission
checks.

Thanks.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ