[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130723194540.GM21100@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 15:45:40 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org,
jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
prarit@...hat.com, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com,
yanghy@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/21] x86, acpi: Also initialize signature and length
when parsing root table.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:59:21PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> @@ -514,6 +514,7 @@ acpi_tb_install_table(acpi_physical_address address,
> * fully mapped later (in verify table). In any case, we must
> * unmap the header that was mapped above.
> */
> + table_desc = &acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables[table_index];
> final_table = acpi_tb_table_override(table, table_desc);
> if (!final_table) {
> final_table = table; /* There was no override */
Is this chunk correct? Why is @table_desc being assigned twice in
this function?
> + /*
> + * Also initialize the table entries here, so that later we can use them
> + * to find SRAT at very eraly time to reserve hotpluggable memory.
^ typo
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists