[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130723205557.GS21100@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:55:57 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de, yinghai@...nel.org,
jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org, mina86@...a86.com,
gong.chen@...ux.intel.com, vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com,
lwoodman@...hat.com, riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com,
prarit@...hat.com, zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com,
yanghy@...fujitsu.com, x86@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/21] x86, acpi, numa: Reserve hotpluggable memory at
early time.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 03:59:27PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> + /*
> + * In such an early time, we don't have nid. We specify pxm
> + * instead of MAX_NUMNODES to prevent memblock merging regions
> + * on different nodes. And later modify pxm to nid when nid is
> + * mapped so that we can arrange ZONE_MOVABLE on different
> + * nodes.
> + */
> + memblock_reserve_hotpluggable(base_address, length, pxm);
This is rather hacky. Why not just introduce MEMBLOCK_NO_MERGE flag?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists