| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51EEF2DA.3070903@tilera.com> Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:17:14 -0400 From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com> To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> CC: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@...il.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>, Xiangliang Yu <yuxiangl@...vell.com>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] mvsas: fix unaligned-access kernel panic under heavy disk testing On 7/23/2013 5:00 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 16:50 -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote: >> > The slot->response value may not be aligned, so should be read >> > using the appropriate kernel "unaligned" accessor. > Hm, institutional memory re-presenting the wrong patch? However, I am > reminded to push the right one in spite of no ack from marvell. You may be right; the original author of that patch is not me, but someone else here at Tilera. That said, the version I pushed is effectively the version we have in the tip of our tree, so if we've ended up carrying the wrong patch, that's bad! Let me know what the right patch is that you have - thanks. -- Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp. http://www.tilera.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists