linux-kernel - Re: [microblaze-linux] [RESEND PATCH] microblaze: Fix clone syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130724073948.GS3249@brightrain.aerifal.cx>
Date:	Wed, 24 Jul 2013 03:39:49 -0400
From:	Rich Felker <dalias@...ifal.cx>
To:	Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	dholsgrove@...inx.com, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
	microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [microblaze-linux] [RESEND PATCH] microblaze: Fix clone syscall

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 09:16:03AM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:
> BTW: Where to get musl package

Source is available from http://www.musl-libc.org/. We also have cross
compilers and binaries for a number of archs here:

  https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross

However, microblaze was not included since the support in the upstream
GNU packages seemed to be broken/unusable. If this has changed, please
let me know. I'd really like to get microblaze support added added to
the cross-compiler builds.

> and are there any tests we should regularly run?

We have a libc-test package under development here:

  http://nsz.repo.hu/git/?p=libc-test

There's nothing musl-specific about the tests; they can also be run
against glibc, and presumably uClibc too. It's still a bit
experimental now, and still pulling in tests we had in various
non-unified test modules into a proper test framework, but it may be
useful.

Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/