[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724104931.GF27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 12:49:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>, mingo@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: update_top_cache_domain only at the times of
building sched domain.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 04:34:39PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> But your patch will run the risk to get a freed sd, since you make
> 'sd_llc' wrong for a period of time (between destroy and rebuild) IMO.
>
> I guess I get you point, you are trying to save one time update since
> you think this will be done twice, but actually the result of this two
> time update was different, it's not redo and it's in order to sync
> 'sd_llc' with 'rq->sd'.
Michael is right, you cannot skip update_top_cache_domain() when
destroying things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists