[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724000433.GA27651@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 17:04:33 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] mostly lockless tty echo
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 10:04:20AM -0400, Peter Hurley wrote:
> ** v2 changes **
> - Rebased on v2 of 'lockless tty flip buffers'
>
> This 3rd of 4 patchsets implements a mostly-lockless tty echo output.
>
> Because echoing is performed solely by the single-threaded ldisc
> receive_buf() method, most of the lockless requirements are already
> in-place. The main existing complications were;
> 1) Echoing could overrun itself. A fixed-size buffer is used to record
> the operations necessary when outputting the echoes; the most recent
> echo data is preserved.
> 2) An attempt to push unprocessed echoes is made by the n_tty_write method
> (on a different thread) before attempting write output.
>
> The overrun condition is solved by outputting the echoes in blocks and
> ensuring that at least that much space is available each time an echo
> operation is committed. At the conclusion of each flip buffer received,
> any remaining unprocessed echoes are output.
>
> This block output method is particularly effective when there is no reader
> (the tty is output-only) and termios is misconfigured with echo enabled.
>
> The concurrent access by the n_tty_write() method is already excluded
> by the existing output_lock mutex.
Applied, thanks.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists