[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724131526.GD4203@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:15:27 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 13/15] perf tools: expand
perf_event__synthesize_sample()
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 04:15:20PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote:
SNIP
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER) {
> >> + if (sample->user_regs.regs && sample_regs_user) {
> >> + *array++ = sample_regs_user;
> >
> > it's 'enum perf_sample_regs_abi' value that goes here ^^^
> >
> > I guess for now it could be hardcoded like:
> >
> > #if defined(__x86_64__)
> > abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64
> > #else
> > #if defined(__i386__)
> > abi = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_64
ugh, PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_ABI_32 ^^^ of course ;-)
> > #endif
> > WARN()
> > #endif
>
> Thanks for reviewing this.
>
> Why isn't it better to leave it as a parameter?
np, you could have it as parameter.. but I guess for now
you'll endup with above code in the upper layer anyway
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists