[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1374674565.164449618@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:02:45 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, 709647@...s.debian.org,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarniig@....hi.is> (against 3.2),
"Bjarni Ingi Gislason" <bjarniig@....hi.is>
Subject: [49/85] genirq: Fix can_request_irq() for IRQs without an action
3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
commit 2779db8d37d4b542d9ca2575f5f178dbeaca6c86 upstream.
Commit 02725e7471b8 ('genirq: Use irq_get/put functions'),
inadvertently changed can_request_irq() to return 0 for IRQs that have
no action. This causes pcibios_lookup_irq() to select only IRQs that
already have an action with IRQF_SHARED set, or to fail if there are
none. Change can_request_irq() to return 1 for IRQs that have no
action (if the first two conditions are met).
Reported-by: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarniig@....hi.is>
Tested-by: Bjarni Ingi Gislason <bjarniig@....hi.is> (against 3.2)
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: 709647@...s.debian.org
Link: http://bugs.debian.org/709647
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1372383630.23847.40.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -539,9 +539,9 @@ int can_request_irq(unsigned int irq, un
return 0;
if (irq_settings_can_request(desc)) {
- if (desc->action)
- if (irqflags & desc->action->flags & IRQF_SHARED)
- canrequest =1;
+ if (!desc->action ||
+ irqflags & desc->action->flags & IRQF_SHARED)
+ canrequest = 1;
}
irq_put_desc_unlock(desc, flags);
return canrequest;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists