[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724153018.GA17960@mail.hallyn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:30:18 +0000
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH] vfs: Lock in place mounts from more privileged
users
Quoting Serge E. Hallyn (serge@...lyn.com):
> Quoting Eric W. Biederman (ebiederm@...ssion.com):
> >
> > Serge does this patch break lxc? I think all should be well but I want
> > to make certain there is not some hidden case where this fundamentaly
> > breaks some functionality.
>
> I haven't yet tried. I'll build and test a kernel today. I'm pretty
> sure all the child's mounts are done after clone, so I *think* the worst
> case will be that the unmounting of put_old after pivot_root() will
> be noisy. Will let you know.
>
> -serge
Just tested it - works fine. Warns about all of the failed umounts.
Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
( Mind you I'm not approving of the idea of hiding mounts as a security
mechanisms, but I know that neither are you :)
thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists