linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] APEI/ERST: Fix error message formatting

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:10:56 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	Anton Vorontsov <anton@...msg.org>,
	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] APEI/ERST: Fix error message formatting

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:43:47PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> While looking at this, I noticed that we seem to be using varying
> field widths in our APEI code: - einj.c has two instances using
> %#010llx. - apei-base.c uses widths of 10 (4 bytes) and 6 (2 bytes).
>
> Not sure if these are intentional and those fields truly aren't 64-bit
> (as suggested by the usage of long long int).

That's an interesting question but I think you're better fitted to
answer it - I try to avoid the APEI spec as much as possible.

:-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/