[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724183912.GC27761@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:39:12 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] clk: implement remuxing during set_rate
On 06/21, James Hogan wrote:
> On 21 June 2013 18:04, Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org> wrote:
> > Quoting James Hogan (2013-06-13 09:05:57)
> >> This patchset adds support for automatic selection of the best parent
> >> for a clock mux, i.e. the one which can provide the closest clock rate
> >> to that requested. It can be disabled by a new CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT
> >> flag (which is set for all uses of clk_register_mux().
> >>
> >> This works by way of adding a new op, determine_rate, similar to
> >> round_rate but with an extra parameter to allow the clock driver to
> >> optionally select a different parent clock. This is used in
> >> clk_calc_new_rates to decide whether to initiate a set_parent operation.
> >
> > Hi James,
> >
> > I'm going to hold off on this one for 3.11. I'll revisit it after the
> > next merge window.
>
> Okay, no worries.
>
Has a new patchset been sent out? I'd like to see this merge in
3.12.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists