[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130724190453.GJ8508@moon>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 23:04:53 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Save soft-dirty bits on swapped pages
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:55:41PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >
> > Well, some part of information already lays in pte (such as 'file' bit,
> > swap entries) so it looks natural i think to work on this level. but
> > letme think if use page struct for that be more convenient...
>
> It hardly will be. Consider we have a page shared between two tasks,
> then first one "touches" it and soft-dirty is put onto his PTE and,
> subsequently, the page itself. The we go and clear sofr-dirty for the
> 2nd task. What should we do with the soft-dirty bit on the page?
Indeed, this won't help. Well then, bippidy-boppidy-boo, our
pants are metaphorically on fire (c)
>
> The soft-dirty thing watches changes in the virtual memory, not in
> the physical one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists