[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F0DAD1.8080108@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:59:13 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"gleb@...hat.com" <gleb@...hat.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] x86: properly handle kvm emulation of hyperv
Il 24/07/2013 23:37, H. Peter Anvin ha scritto:
> What I'm suggesting is exactly that except that the native hypervisor is later in CPUID space.
Me too actually.
I was just suggesting an implementation of the idea (that takes into
account hypervisors detected by other means than CPUID).
Paolo
> KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> wrote:
>> As Paolo suggested if there were some priority encoded, the guest could make an
>> informed decision. If the guest under question can run on both hypervisors A and B,
>> we would rather the guest discover hypervisor A when running on A and
>> hypervisor B when running on B. The priority encoding could be as simple as
>> surfacing the native hypervisor signature earlier in the CPUID space.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists