| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 16:23:39 +0800
From: zwu.kernel@...il.com
To: xfs@....sgi.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] xfs: introduce object readahead to log recovery
From: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
It can take a long time to run log recovery operation because it is
single threaded and is bound by read latency. We can find that it took
most of the time to wait for the read IO to occur, so if one object
readahead is introduced to log recovery, it will obviously reduce the
log recovery time.
In dirty log case as below:
data device: 0xfd10
log device: 0xfd10 daddr: 20480032 length: 20480
log tail: 7941 head: 11077 state: <DIRTY>
This dirty ratio is about 15%. I am trying to do tests in larger scale
and dirtier filesystem environment.
Log recovery time stat:
w/o this patch w/ this patch
real 0m1.051s 0m0.965s
sys 0m0.033s 0m0.035s
iowait 0m1.018s 0m0.930s
Signed-off-by: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
index 6fcc910a..f07e5e0 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
@@ -3107,6 +3107,121 @@ xlog_recover_free_trans(
kmem_free(trans);
}
+STATIC void
+xlog_recover_buffer_ra_pass2(
+ struct xlog *log,
+ struct xlog_recover_item *item)
+{
+ xfs_buf_log_format_t *buf_f = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
+ xfs_mount_t *mp = log->l_mp;
+
+ if (xlog_check_buffer_cancelled(log, buf_f->blf_blkno,
+ buf_f->blf_len, buf_f->blf_flags)) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ xfs_buf_readahead(mp->m_ddev_targp, buf_f->blf_blkno,
+ buf_f->blf_len, NULL);
+}
+
+STATIC void
+xlog_recover_inode_ra_pass2(
+ struct xlog *log,
+ struct xlog_recover_item *item)
+{
+ xfs_inode_log_format_t *in_f;
+ xfs_mount_t *mp = log->l_mp;
+ int error;
+ int need_free = 0;
+
+ if (item->ri_buf[0].i_len == sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_t)) {
+ in_f = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
+ } else {
+ in_f = kmem_alloc(sizeof(xfs_inode_log_format_t), KM_SLEEP);
+ need_free = 1;
+ error = xfs_inode_item_format_convert(&item->ri_buf[0], in_f);
+ if (error)
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ if (xlog_check_buffer_cancelled(log, in_f->ilf_blkno,
+ in_f->ilf_len, 0)) {
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ xfs_buf_readahead(mp->m_ddev_targp, in_f->ilf_blkno,
+ in_f->ilf_len, &xfs_inode_buf_ops);
+
+error:
+ if (need_free)
+ kmem_free(in_f);
+}
+
+STATIC void
+xlog_recover_dquot_ra_pass2(
+ struct xlog *log,
+ struct xlog_recover_item *item)
+{
+ xfs_mount_t *mp = log->l_mp;
+ xfs_buf_t *bp;
+ struct xfs_disk_dquot *recddq;
+ int error;
+ xfs_dq_logformat_t *dq_f;
+ uint type;
+
+
+ if (mp->m_qflags == 0)
+ return;
+
+ recddq = item->ri_buf[1].i_addr;
+ if (recddq == NULL)
+ return;
+ if (item->ri_buf[1].i_len < sizeof(xfs_disk_dquot_t))
+ return;
+
+ type = recddq->d_flags & (XFS_DQ_USER | XFS_DQ_PROJ | XFS_DQ_GROUP);
+ ASSERT(type);
+ if (log->l_quotaoffs_flag & type)
+ return;
+
+ dq_f = item->ri_buf[0].i_addr;
+ ASSERT(dq_f);
+ error = xfs_qm_dqcheck(mp, recddq, dq_f->qlf_id, 0, XFS_QMOPT_DOWARN,
+ "xlog_recover_dquot_ra_pass2 (log copy)");
+ if (error)
+ return;
+ ASSERT(dq_f->qlf_len == 1);
+
+ error = xfs_trans_read_buf(mp, NULL, mp->m_ddev_targp, dq_f->qlf_blkno,
+ XFS_FSB_TO_BB(mp, dq_f->qlf_len), 0, &bp,
+ NULL);
+ if (!error)
+ xfs_buf_relse(bp);
+}
+
+STATIC void
+xlog_recover_ra_pass2(
+ struct xlog *log,
+ struct xlog_recover_item *item)
+{
+ switch (ITEM_TYPE(item)) {
+ case XFS_LI_BUF:
+ xlog_recover_buffer_ra_pass2(log, item);
+ break;
+ case XFS_LI_INODE:
+ xlog_recover_inode_ra_pass2(log, item);
+ break;
+ case XFS_LI_DQUOT:
+ xlog_recover_dquot_ra_pass2(log, item);
+ break;
+ case XFS_LI_EFI:
+ case XFS_LI_EFD:
+ case XFS_LI_QUOTAOFF:
+ default:
+ break;
+ }
+}
+
STATIC int
xlog_recover_commit_pass1(
struct xlog *log,
@@ -3140,10 +3255,14 @@ xlog_recover_commit_pass2(
struct xlog *log,
struct xlog_recover *trans,
struct list_head *buffer_list,
- struct xlog_recover_item *item)
+ struct xlog_recover_item *item,
+ struct xlog_recover_item *next_item)
{
trace_xfs_log_recover_item_recover(log, trans, item, XLOG_RECOVER_PASS2);
+ if (next_item)
+ xlog_recover_ra_pass2(log, next_item);
+
switch (ITEM_TYPE(item)) {
case XFS_LI_BUF:
return xlog_recover_buffer_pass2(log, buffer_list, item);
@@ -3181,7 +3300,7 @@ xlog_recover_commit_trans(
int pass)
{
int error = 0, error2;
- xlog_recover_item_t *item;
+ xlog_recover_item_t *item, *next_item, *temp_item;
LIST_HEAD (buffer_list);
hlist_del(&trans->r_list);
@@ -3190,14 +3309,18 @@ xlog_recover_commit_trans(
if (error)
return error;
- list_for_each_entry(item, &trans->r_itemq, ri_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(item, temp_item, &trans->r_itemq, ri_list) {
switch (pass) {
case XLOG_RECOVER_PASS1:
error = xlog_recover_commit_pass1(log, trans, item);
break;
case XLOG_RECOVER_PASS2:
+ if (&temp_item->ri_list != &trans->r_itemq)
+ next_item = temp_item;
+ else
+ next_item = NULL;
error = xlog_recover_commit_pass2(log, trans,
- &buffer_list, item);
+ &buffer_list, item, next_item);
break;
default:
ASSERT(0);
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists