linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add support for pinned modifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130725110447.GS27075@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jul 2013 13:04:47 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
	mingo@...hat.com, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Add support for pinned modifier

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:26:42PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> 
> I would have used "p" obviously, but that's taken. Are folks happy that
> "P" is sufficiently different from "p"? I couldn't think of anything
> better.

I've seen proposals where 'P' is used for the max 'p' level :/

But yes, vexing situation. 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/