[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <51F11B46.7010900@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:34:14 +0200
From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
To: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.linux@...il.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
Prashant Gaikwad <pgaikwad@...dia.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de>,
Joseph Lo <josephl@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/5] clk: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag
Hi James,
On 06/13/2013 06:06 PM, James Hogan wrote:
> Add a CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT clock flag, which will prevent muxes
> being reparented during clk_set_rate.
>
> To avoid breaking existing platforms, all callers of clk_register_mux()
> are adjusted to pass the new flag. Platform maintainers are encouraged
> to remove the flag if they wish to allow mux reparenting on set_rate.
[..]
> Changes in v3:
>
> * rename/invert CLK_SET_RATE_REMUX to CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT and move
> to this new patch.
> * patch 3: add CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT flag to all callers of
> clk_register_mux. If you don't mind your clocks being reparented in
> response to set_rate please let me know and I'll drop the relevant
> portion of the patch.
Why is this better to change current behaviour of the clock core
and modify all drivers instead of having, e.g. CLK_SET_RATE_REPARENT
set in drivers of hardware that supports clock re-parenting while
setting clock rate ?
Is there intention to just have the automatic clock re-parenting
as a default feature in the common clock API ?
My apologies if this has already been answered, I haven't been
following this thread.
Thanks,
Sylwester
> arch/arm/mach-imx/clk.h | 5 +-
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-mmp2.c | 39 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa168.c | 40 +++++---
> drivers/clk/mmp/clk-pxa910.c | 31 +++---
> drivers/clk/mxs/clk.h | 4 +-
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h | 2 +-
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1310_clock.c | 179 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear1340_clock.c | 97 ++++++++++---------
> drivers/clk/spear/spear3xx_clock.c | 57 +++++++----
> drivers/clk/spear/spear6xx_clock.c | 35 +++----
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 3 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra114.c | 36 ++++---
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra20.c | 6 +-
> drivers/clk/tegra/clk-tegra30.c | 33 ++++---
> drivers/clk/versatile/clk-vexpress.c | 4 +-
> include/linux/clk-provider.h | 1 +
> 16 files changed, 334 insertions(+), 238 deletions(-)
--
Sylwester Nawrocki
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists