[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725131556.GD9858@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:15:56 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: How to create IRQ mappings in a GPIO driver that doesn't control
its IRQ domain ?
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:45:33AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> The two devices are independent, so there's no real parent/child relationship.
> However, as Grant proposed, I could list all the interrupts associated with
> GPIOs in the GPIO controller DT node. I would then just call
> irq_of_parse_and_map() in the .to_irq() handler to magically translate the
> GPIO number to a mapped IRQ number.
> The number of interrupts can be pretty high (up to 58 in the worst case so
> far), so an alternative would be to specify the interrupt-parent only, and
> call irq_create_of_mapping() directly. What solution would you prefer ?
Are the interrupts in a contiguous block in the controller so you can
just pass around the controller and a base number?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists