| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUkbWNK7unUYJVCvdPypa0TkfybSm-Jtv917MNV=vok6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 06:52:15 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Nate Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale-asia.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] Sparse initialization of struct page array.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 05:50:57AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Robin Holt <holt@....com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> How about holes that is not in memblock.reserved?
>> >>
>> >> before this patch:
>> >> free_area_init_node/free_area_init_core/memmap_init_zone
>> >> will mark all page in node range to Reserved in struct page, at first.
>> >>
>> >> but those holes is not mapped via kernel low mapping.
>> >> so it should be ok not touch "struct page" for them.
>> >>
>> >> Now you only mark reserved for memblock.reserved at first, and later
>> >> mark {memblock.memory} - { memblock.reserved} to be available.
>> >> And that is ok.
>> >>
>> >> but should split that change to another patch and add some comment
>> >> and change log for the change.
>> >> in case there is some user like UEFI etc do weird thing.
>> >
>> > Nate and I talked this over today. Sorry for the delay, but it was the
>> > first time we were both free. Neither of us quite understands what you
>> > are asking for here. My interpretation is that you would like us to
>> > change the use of the PageReserved flag such that during boot, we do not
>> > set the flag at all from memmap_init_zone, and then only set it on pages
>> > which, at the time of free_all_bootmem, have been allocated/reserved in
>> > the memblock allocator. Is that correct? I will start to work that up
>> > on the assumption that is what you are asking for.
>>
>> Not exactly.
>>
>> your change should be right, but there is some subtle change about
>> holes handling.
>>
>> before mem holes between memory ranges in memblock.memory, get struct page,
>> and initialized with to Reserved in memmap_init_zone.
>> Those holes is not in memory.reserved, with your patches, those hole's
>> struct page
>> will still have all 0.
>>
>> Please separate change about set page to reserved according to memory.reserved
>> to another patch.
>
>
> Just want to make sure this is where you want me to go. Here is my
> currently untested patch. Is that what you were expecting to have done?
> One thing I don't like about this patch is it seems to slow down boot in
> my simulator environment. I think I am going to look at restructuring
> things a bit to see if I can eliminate that performance penalty.
> Otherwise, I think I am following your directions.
>
> From bdd2fefa59af18f283af6f066bc644ddfa5c7da8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 04:25:15 -0500
> Subject: [RFC -v2-pre2 4/5] ZZZ Only SegPageReserved() on memblock reserved
> pages.
yes.
>
> ---
> include/linux/mm.h | 2 ++
> mm/nobootmem.c | 3 +++
> mm/page_alloc.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index e0c8528..b264a26 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1322,6 +1322,8 @@ static inline void adjust_managed_page_count(struct page *page, long count)
> totalram_pages += count;
> }
>
> +extern void reserve_bootmem_region(unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
> +
> /* Free the reserved page into the buddy system, so it gets managed. */
> static inline void __free_reserved_page(struct page *page)
> {
> diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
> index 2159e68..0840af2 100644
> --- a/mm/nobootmem.c
> +++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
> @@ -117,6 +117,9 @@ static unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(void)
> phys_addr_t start, end, size;
> u64 i;
>
> + for_each_reserved_mem_region(i, &start, &end)
> + reserve_bootmem_region(start, end);
> +
> for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL)
> count += __free_memory_core(start, end);
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 048e166..3aa30b7 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ static void free_one_page(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int order,
> }
>
> static void __init_single_page(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone,
> - int nid, int reserved)
> + int nid, int page_count)
> {
> struct page *page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
> struct zone *z = &NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zones[zone];
> @@ -708,12 +708,9 @@ static void __init_single_page(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone,
> init_page_count(page);
> page_mapcount_reset(page);
> page_nid_reset_last(page);
> - if (reserved) {
> - SetPageReserved(page);
> - } else {
> - ClearPageReserved(page);
> - set_page_count(page, 0);
> - }
> + ClearPageReserved(page);
> + set_page_count(page, page_count);
> +
> /*
> * Mark the block movable so that blocks are reserved for
> * movable at startup. This will force kernel allocations
> @@ -741,6 +738,13 @@ static void __init_single_page(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long zone,
> #endif
> }
>
> +void reserve_bootmem_region(unsigned long start, unsigned long end)
> +{
> + for (; start < end; start++)
> + if (pfn_valid(start))
> + SetPageReserved(pfn_to_page(start));
> +}
> +
> static bool free_pages_prepare(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
> {
> int i;
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists