[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMP44s1szaS0BVpGfDS66aeox9j0YT5D3pdsjMhz64LW-uVczw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:00:37 -0500
From: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
To: Daniel Phillips <d.phillips@...tner.samsung.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
"ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 3:57 AM, Daniel Phillips
<d.phillips@...tner.samsung.com> wrote:
> On 07/24/2013 12:51 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> Your mistaken fallacy seems to be that you think one can *always* be
>> both A (open and honest), and B (polite)...
>
> You are are right, I do think that you can *always* be both open and
> honest, and polite. I do not believe that I am mistaken. And I hope that
> you will come to agree with me in the not too distant future.
What I come to agree is irrelevant. What you _hope_ is not important.
What you _believe_ doesn't really matter.
You've stated what you *think*, that barely has any value in the
discussion, but all right, you've done so already... duly noted.
Moving on. What can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed
without evidence.
--
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists