[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <828d748273884d6f9c24b658964f97c3@SN2PR03MB061.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:49:00 +0000
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
CC: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com" <kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com>,
"hannes@...xchg.org" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"yinghan@...gle.com" <yinghan@...gle.com>,
"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"kay@...y.org" <kay@...y.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: base: memory: Export symbols for onlining
memory blocks
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Hansen [mailto:dave@...1.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 11:04 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Michal Hocko; gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de; apw@...onical.com;
> andi@...stfloor.org; akpm@...ux-foundation.org; linux-mm@...ck.org;
> kamezawa.hiroyuki@...il.com; hannes@...xchg.org; yinghan@...gle.com;
> jasowang@...hat.com; kay@...y.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Drivers: base: memory: Export symbols for onlining
> memory blocks
>
> On 07/25/2013 04:14 AM, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > As promised, I have sent out the patches for (a) an implementation of an in-
> kernel API
> > for onlining and a consumer for this API. While I don't know the exact reason
> why the
> > user mode code is delayed (under some low memory conditions), what is the
> harm in having
> > a mechanism to online memory that has been hot added without involving user
> space code.
>
> KY, your potential problem, not being able to online more memory because
> of a shortage of memory, is a serious one.
All I can say is that the online is not happening within the allowed time (5 seconds in
the current code).
>
> However, this potential issue exists in long-standing code, and
> potentially affects all users of memory hotplug. The problem has not
> been described in sufficient detail for the rest of the developers to
> tell if you are facing a new problem, or whether *any* proposed solution
> will help the problem you face.
>
> Your propsed solution changes the semantics of existing user/kernel
> interfaces, duplicates existing functionality, and adds code complexity
> to the kernel.
How so? All I am doing is to use the existing infrastructure to online
memory. The only change I have made is to export an API that allows
onlining without involving any user space code. I don't see how this
adds complexity to the kernel. This would be an useful extension as can
be seen from its usage in the Hyper-V balloon driver.
In my particular use case, I need to wait for the memory to be onlined before
I can proceed to hot add the next chunk. This synchronization can be completely
avoided if we can avoid the involvement of user level code. I would submit to you that
this is a valid use case that we ought to be able to support.
Regards,
K. Y
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists