[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374716480.1924.18.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 18:41:20 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH - diffstat only] include/net: Remove extern from
function prototypes
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 01:27 +0000, Cong Wang wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 at 17:58 GMT, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
You dropped the author from the cc list.
Always reply to the author.
> > Function prototypes don't need to be declared
> > extern in .h files. It's assumed by the compiler
> > and is as unnecessary as using auto is when
> > declaring automatic/local variables in a block.
> >
> Since we all know this, why bother it?
If everyone knew this, new ones wouldn't be added.
But a lot are.
Removing extern makes prototypes shorter and more readable.
More prototypes fit in a single line
More arguments fit on a multi-line prototypes.
> Having "extern" doesn't harm
> readability, instead it probably helps.
Sure, just like auto does. Why isn't that used?
> > I believe it makes grepping for extern useful as
> > all the matches are actual variables and structs.
> You need a semantic tool.
No, not really. I'm fairly comfortable with spatch.
spatch takes a long time to run for a lot of things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists