[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725164542.GF29694@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:45:42 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 04/14] clk: Add set_rate_and_parent() op
On 07/25, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 of July 2013 17:43:32 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Some of Qualcomm's clocks can change their parent and rate at the
> > same time with a single register write. Add support for this
> > hardware to the common clock framework by adding a new
> > set_rate_and_parent() op. When the clock framework determines
> > that both the parent and the rate are going to change during
> > clk_set_rate() it will call the .set_rate_and_parent() op if
> > available and fall back to calling .set_parent() followed by
> > .set_rate() otherwise.
>
> This is strange. Does you hardware support switching parent and rate
> separately or you always need to set both and so all the fuss here?
It supports setting the parent or setting the rate, or setting
both at the same time.
>
> If the latter is the case, then maybe you can simply keep parent index and
> rate cached inside driver data of your clock driver and use them on any
> .set_rate() or .set_parent() calls?
This will not work. In fact, doing that would cause us to
overclock hardware for a short time between switching the parent
and the rate.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists