[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F1676C.5050408@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:59:08 -0700
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have people interested in device
tree janitoring / cleanup?]
On 07/25/2013 09:09 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
...
> One problem that needs to be solved is obviously how a binding
> graduates from tentative to locked. This work isn't going to be very
> interesting to most people, I suspect. Think standards committee type
> work.
I assume that's part of what being a maintainer of the DT bindings tree
means?
+1 on everything else you said. I've been traveling this week so haven't
had much time for email, but if I hadn't, I hope I would have said
something similar:-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists