[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130725200435.GW9858@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 21:04:35 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org"
<ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Domenico Andreoli <cavokz@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave P Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] DT bindings as ABI [was: Do we have
people interested in device tree janitoring / cleanup?]
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 03:31:35PM -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:
> I think the idea of a 'tentative' directory (or 'locked') is churnish,
> but necessary. If I DL'd a tarball and had to type 'tentative' to get
> to the binding doc I wanted, that would be a pretty clear clue to be
> delicate about how I trust/use/plan with that binding.
Another option for this is to annotate within the document itself.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists