[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130725.140933.1460349218585474906.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:09:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sony.chacko@...gic.com
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rajesh.borundia@...gic.com,
shahed.shaikh@...gic.com, jitendra.kalsaria@...gic.com,
Linux-Driver@...gic.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: qlcnic binary sysfs file abuse
From: Sony Chacko <sony.chacko@...gic.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:37:46 +0000
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2013 5:30 PM
>> To: Rajesh Borundia; Shahed Shaikh; Jitendra Kalsaria; Sony Chacko; Dept-Eng
>> Linux Driver
>> Cc: netdev; linux-kernel
>> Subject: qlcnic binary sysfs file abuse
>>
>> I was doing a kernel-wide audit on all of the binary sysfs files, and noticed a
>> metric ton of them in the qlcnic driver.
>>
>> So, any objection to me just deleting these entirely? Or, if they really are
>> needed, can I just move them to debugfs, which is where I think they should
>> have been from the beginning?
>
> Some applications are using these files, please move them to debugfs.
This is quite a mess, and I've complained about all of the crazy
files created by qlcnic in the past.
debugfs is for things that do not create a ABI which the kernel has to
maintain forever.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists