[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374790082.7397.1411.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 15:08:02 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/1] AHCI: Optimize interrupt processing
On Thu, 2013-07-25 at 12:16 +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 02:10:36PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > Np. FYI, you'll want to use the latest commit e7827b351 HEAD from
> > target-pending/scsi-mq, which now has functioning scsi-generic support.
>
> Survives a boot, a kernel build and the build's result :)
Great. Thanks for the feedback Alexander!
So the next step on my end is to enable -mq for ahci, and verify initial
correctness using QEMU/KVM hardware emulation.
Btw, I've been looking at enabling the SHT->cmd_size for struct
ata_queued_cmd descriptor pre-allocation, but AFAICT these descriptors
are already all pre-allocated by libata and obtained via ata_qc_new() ->
__ata_qc_from_tag() during ata_scsi_queuecmd().
So that said, with the struct request + struct scsi_cmnd pre-allocations
already provided by blk-mq -> scsi-mq code, all memory allocations
should have already been eliminated from I/O fast path.
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists