linux-kernel - Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+icZUXZKndg7==Y6v2Z45WZDp+tDC5FzaOC=KWTf4m=rjUKnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jul 2013 01:21:07 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: Tree for Jul 25 [ call-trace: drm |
 drm-intel related? ]

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:07:02PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> What means the bang line?
>>
>> [    54.564] (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0
>> [    54.565] bang: 1159
>> [    54.565]
>> Fatal server error:
>> [    54.565] failed to create screen resources
>
> That means between the kernel reporting success for
> DRM_IOCTL_I915_GEM_MMAP_GTT and libdrm returning from
> drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(), something went wrong. This implies that the
> call to mmap() failed.
>
> I don't see how changing versions of the ddx would unmask the bug, nor
> why the mmap() should suddenly start failing. Anybody have any
> suggestions other than
>
> diff --git a/src/intel_uxa.c b/src/intel_uxa.c
> index 2f14173..3872258 100644
> --- a/src/intel_uxa.c
> +++ b/src/intel_uxa.c
> @@ -1149,12 +1149,15 @@ Bool intel_uxa_create_screen_resources(ScreenPtr screen)
>         PixmapPtr pixmap;
>         intel_screen_private *intel = intel_get_screen_private(scrn);
>         dri_bo *bo = intel->front_buffer;
> +       int ret;
>
>         if (!uxa_resources_init(screen))
>                 return FALSE;
>
> -       if (drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(bo))
> +       if ((ret = drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(bo))) {
> +               ErrorF("%s:%d bang, errno=%d\n", __func__, __LINE__, -ret);
>                 return FALSE;
> +       }
>
>         pixmap = screen->GetScreenPixmap(screen);
>         intel_set_pixmap_bo(pixmap, bo);
>
> which is most likely to report EINVAL (22)?

Yupp, this shows me...

[    28.542] (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0
[    28.543] intel_uxa_create_screen_resources:1158 bang, errno=22
[    28.543]
Fatal server error:
[    28.543] failed to create screen resources


- Sedat -

> -Chris
>
> --
> Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-next" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Download attachment "Xorg.0.log" of type "application/octet-stream" (18891 bytes)