[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374723112.1924.41.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 20:31:52 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH] checkpatch: Fix networking kernel-doc block comment defect
checkpatch can generate a false positive when inserting
a new kernel-doc block and function above an existing
kernel-doc block.
Fix it by checking that the context line is also a newly
inserted line.
Reported-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
---
scripts/checkpatch.pl | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 23126d4..c18e1be 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2074,6 +2074,7 @@ sub process {
if ($realfile =~ m@^(drivers/net/|net/)@ &&
$prevrawline =~ /^\+[ \t]*\/\*/ && #starting /*
$prevrawline !~ /\*\/[ \t]*$/ && #no trailing */
+ $rawline =~ /^\+/ && #line is new
$rawline !~ /^\+[ \t]*\*/) { #no leading *
WARN("NETWORKING_BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE",
"networking block comments start with * on subsequent lines\n" . $hereprev);
--
1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists