[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F1CB4D.2020301@asianux.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:05:17 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG()
On 07/26/2013 06:05 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win
>>> a K or two.)
>>>
>>
>> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your
>> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?
>
> I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny
> additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are
> crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a
> measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree
> patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support.
>
Thank you for your reply in details.
Thanks
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists