[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F24864.7070306@tnsoft.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:59:00 +0800
From: Dennis Chen <xschen@...oft.com.cn>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
Dennis Chen <xschen@...oft.com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] race condition fixing in sysfs_create_dir
On 07/26/2013 05:49 PM, Dennis Chen wrote:
> The patch is trying its best to avoid creating a dir under a parent dir which is removing from
> the system:
> PATH0 (create a dir under 'PARENT/...') PATH1 (remove the 'PARENT/...')
> sysfs_create_dir() { sysfs_remove_dir() {
> ... ...
> if (kobj->parent) spin_lock(&sysfs_assoc_lock);
> parent_sd = kobj->parent->sd; <----- kobj->sd = NULL;
> else spin_unlock(&sysfs_assoc_lock);
> parent_sd = &sysfs_root;
> Suppose PATH1 enter the critical section first, then PATH0 begin to execute before kobj->sd
> has been reset to NULL, possibly PATH0 will get a non-NULL parent_sd since lack of the
> sysfs_assoc_lock protection in PATH0. In this case, PATH0 think it has a valid parent_sd which
> can be freed by PATH1 in the followed, refer to the comments in the patch. Maybe we need
> to figure out a perfect solution to solve the race condition, although the codes in question are
> in slow path...
> Signed-off-by: Dennis Chen <xschen@...oft.com.cn>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <teheo@...e.de>
should be Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Wang Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/sysfs/dir.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> diff --git a/fs/sysfs/dir.c b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> index e068e74..114073d 100644
> --- a/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/sysfs/dir.c
> @@ -746,13 +746,22 @@ int sysfs_create_dir(struct kobject * kobj)
> BUG_ON(!kobj);
> + spin_lock(&sysfs_assoc_lock);
> if (kobj->parent)
> parent_sd = kobj->parent->sd;
> else
> parent_sd = &sysfs_root;
> - if (!parent_sd)
> + if (!parent_sd) {
> + spin_unlock(&sysfs_assoc_lock);
> return -ENOENT;
> + }
> + spin_unlock(&sysfs_assoc_lock);
> + /* TODO: although the sysfs is in a slow path, but in the operation
> + * followed, we still have a window to let the sysfs_remove_dir to
> + * free the memory space pointered by parent_sd till we inc its ref
> + * count in __sysfs_add_one()
> + */
> if (sysfs_ns_type(parent_sd))
> ns = kobj->ktype->namespace(kobj);
Re CC Tejun whose email addess <@suse.de> is obsolete :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists