linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to support boost framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKohponC=S=3=mrTpWvPvejqSeqfndVOwb2GDkQ0jKxXXa0TOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:56:53 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>, durgadoss.r@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/8] cpufreq:exynos:Extend Exynos cpufreq driver to
 support boost framework

On 25 July 2013 22:03, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> index 9ae1871..175172d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> @@ -270,6 +270,9 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_exit(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>
>  static struct freq_attr *exynos_cpufreq_attr[] = {
>         &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_available_freqs,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW

Use ARM_EXYNOS_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW instead.

> +       &cpufreq_freq_attr_scaling_boost_freqs,
> +#endif
>         NULL,
>  };
>
> @@ -332,6 +335,9 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>         locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW
> +       exynos_driver.boost_supported = true;
> +#endif

So, why here and not in the definition of exynos_driver?

>         register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb);
>
>         if (cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver)) {
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/