[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2559996.tgPUuSUm5t@sifl>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 08:52:59 -0400
From: Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the lblnet tree
On Friday, July 26, 2013 02:06:17 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> After merging the lblnet tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> security/selinux/hooks.c: In function 'sb_finish_set_opts':
> security/selinux/hooks.c:448:19: error: 'SE_SBLABELSUPP' undeclared (first
> use in this function) sbsec->flags |= SE_SBLABELSUPP;
> ^
> Caused by commit 8cf9124a324f ("SELinux: Enable setting security contexts
> on rootfs inodes") interacting with commit 12f348b9dcf6 ("SELinux: rename
> SE_SBLABELSUPP to SBLABEL_MNT") from the selinux tree.
>
> This is not helped by the fact that there are a lot of commits in the
> lblnet tree (including 8cf9124a324f) that have been cherry-picked
> (instead of being merged) into the selinux tree. :-(
The problem should be fixed now.
The issue was that I was temporarily holding a lot of these SELinux patches in
the lblnet-next tree so they could get some linux-next exposure while Eric was
busy an unable to update the SELinux tree. Unfortunately, there was some
miscommunication between Eric and I yesterday and the trees got a bit out of
sync. All the lblnet-next patches have now been included in the SELinux tree
so I've "pruned" them from the lblnet-next tree.
Thanks for your understanding,
-Paul
--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists