[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130726151432.GD19472@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:14:32 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexander Z Lam <azl@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
David Sharp <dhsharp@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vaibhav Nagarnaik <vnagarnaik@...gle.com>,
"zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] debugfs: debugfs_remove_recursive() must not rely
on list_empty(d_subdirs)
Argh, sorry for noise.
Please ignore the extra email with the wrong subject.
On 07/26, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> debugfs_remove_recursive() is wrong,
>
> 1. it wrongly assumes that !list_empty(d_subdirs) means that this
> dir should be removed.
>
> This is not that bad by itself, but:
>
> 2. if d_subdirs does not becomes empty after __debugfs_remove()
> it gives up and silently fails, it doesn't even try to remove
> other entries.
>
> However ->d_subdirs can be non-empty because it still has the
> already deleted !debugfs_positive() entries.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists