[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130726164122.GT9858@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:41:22 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: grant.likely@...aro.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
rob.herring@...xeda.com, rob@...dley.net, sameo@...ux.intel.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gg@...mlogic.co.uk, kishon@...com, swarren@...dia.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: palmas: add pincontrol driver
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 03:45:54PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> +pins: gpio0_id, gpio1_vbus_det_led1_pwm1, gpio2_regen_led2_pwm2, gpio3_chrg_det,
> + gpio4_sysen1, gpio5_clk32kgaudio_usb_psel, gpio6_sysen2,
> + gpio7_msecure_pwrhold, gpio8_sim1rsti, gpio9_low_vbat,
> + gpio10_wireless_chrg1, gpio11_rcm, gpio12_sim2rsto, gpio13, gpio14,
> + gpio15_sim2rsti, vac, powergood_usb_psel, nreswarm, pwrdown,
> + gpadc_start, reset_in, nsleep, enable1, enable2, int.
Would it not be easier to just name the GPIOs gpioN rather than using
the full names with the possible functions?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists