linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] msm_serial: Make baud

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJAp7Og1jwyAn0sGbb_1Bk5_fvBWa1AuDNsRV1b17S0Tijk9kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:30:46 -0800
From:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn@...o.se>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] msm_serial: Make baud_code detection more dynamic

On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> [snip]
> +       unsigned int i, divisor;
> +       const struct msm_baud_map *entry;
> +       static const struct msm_baud_map table[] = {
> +               { 1536, 0x00,  1 },
> +               {  768, 0x11,  1 },
> +               {  384, 0x22,  1 },
> +               {  192, 0x33,  1 },
> +               {   96, 0x44,  1 },
> +               {   48, 0x55,  1 },
> +               {   32, 0x66,  1 },
> +               {   24, 0x77,  1 },
> +               {   16, 0x88,  1 },
> +               {   12, 0x99,  6 },
> +               {    8, 0xaa,  6 },
> +               {    6, 0xbb,  6 },
> +               {    4, 0xcc,  6 },
> +               {    3, 0xdd,  8 },
> +               {    2, 0xee, 16 },
> +               {    1, 0xff, 31 },
> +       };
> +
> +       divisor = uart_get_divisor(port, baud);
> +
> +       for (i = 0, entry = table; i < ARRAY_SIZE(table); i++, entry++)
> +               if (entry->divisor <= divisor)
> +                       break;
> +
> +       return entry; /* Default to smallest divider */

Shouldn't matter, but you're not defaulting to the smallest divider.
Your are defaulting to an undefined value, as `entry` will be off the
array once i == ARRAY_SIZE().

Regards,
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/