lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130726204728.172651833@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:47:43 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Subject: [ 53/79] bcache: Journal replay fix

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>

commit faa5673617656ee58369a3cfe4a312cfcdc59c81 upstream.

The journal replay code starts by finding something that looks like a
valid journal entry, then it does a binary search over the unchecked
region of the journal for the journal entries with the highest sequence
numbers.

Trouble is, the logic was wrong - journal_read_bucket() returns true if
it found journal entries we need, but if the range of journal entries
we're looking for loops around the end of the journal - in that case
journal_read_bucket() could return true when it hadn't found the highest
sequence number we'd seen yet, and in that case the binary search did
the wrong thing. Whoops.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/bcache/journal.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/md/bcache/journal.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/journal.c
@@ -182,9 +182,14 @@ bsearch:
 		pr_debug("starting binary search, l %u r %u", l, r);
 
 		while (l + 1 < r) {
+			seq = list_entry(list->prev, struct journal_replay,
+					 list)->j.seq;
+
 			m = (l + r) >> 1;
+			read_bucket(m);
 
-			if (read_bucket(m))
+			if (seq != list_entry(list->prev, struct journal_replay,
+					      list)->j.seq)
 				l = m;
 			else
 				r = m;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ