[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130726230051.GA25990@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:00:51 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] serial: omap: fix wrong context restoration on init
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:11:46PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 02:55:42PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
> > Since commit a630fbf "serial: omap: Fix device tree based PM runtime"
> > the OMAP serial driver will always try to restore its context in
> > serial_omap_runtime_resume(). But the problem is that during driver
> > initialization the UART context is not ready yet and, as result, first
> > call to pm_runtime_get*() will cause UART register overwriting by all
> > zeros. This causes Kernel boot hang in case if "earlyprintk" feature is
> > enabled at least [1].
> >
> > Unfortunately, there is no exact place in driver now where we can
> > determine that UART context is ready - most of registers configured in
> > serial_omap_set_termios(), but some of them in other places.
> > More over, even if PM runtime will be disabled (blocked) during OMAP
> > serial driver probe() execution [2],[3] it will fix only console UART,
> > but context of other UARTs will be overwriting by all zeros during first
> > access to the corresponding UART.
> >
> > To fix this issue:
> > - introduce additional "initialized" flag and update PM runtime callback
> > to do nothing if its not set. Set "initialized" at the end of probe().
> > - read current UART registers configuration in probe and use it by
> > default.
> >
> > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg256828.html
> > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg258062.html
> > [3] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg258040.html
> >
> > CC: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
> > CC: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>
> > CC: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> > CC: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
> > ---
> > tested on OMAP4 SDP with and without earlyprintk enabled.
> > drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > index f39bf0c..e1e9667 100644
> > --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> > @@ -162,6 +162,7 @@ struct uart_omap_port {
> > struct work_struct qos_work;
> > struct pinctrl *pins;
> > bool is_suspending;
> > + bool initialized;
>
> you really think adding this sort of bool flag is the best thing we can
> do ? Something which will, quite likely, spread through every single
> driver ?
I agree, that's not ok, please fix this up "properly" somehow.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists