[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1374894051-31634-1-git-send-email-hanjun.guo@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:00:49 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
Cc: patches@...aro.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Graeme Gregory <graeme.gregory@...aro.org>,
Naresh Bhat <naresh.bhat@...aro.org>,
Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@...aro.org>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] cpu topology: remove stale arch_provides_topology_pointers and define_siblings_show_map/list()
arch_provides_topology_pointers was introduced in commit 23ca4bba3 (x86:
cleanup early per cpu variables/accesses v4) to indicate pointers to the
topology cpumask_t maps are valid to avoid copying data on to/off of the
stack.
But later in commit fbd59a8d (cpumask: Use topology_core_cpumask()/
topology_thread_cpumask()), the pointers to the topology struct cpumask maps
are always valid.
After that commit, the only difference is that there is a redundant
"unsigned int cpu = dev->id;" if arch_provides_topology_pointers defined, but
dev->id is type 'u32' which devolves to 'unsigned int' on all supported arches.
So this arch_provides_topology_pointers define is pointless and only cause
obfuscation now, remove it.
Tested on x86 machine, topology information in sys/devices/system/cpu/
cpuX/topology/ is the same after appling this patch set.
Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
---
drivers/base/topology.c | 20 --------------------
1 file changed, 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/topology.c b/drivers/base/topology.c
index 2f5919e..94ffee3 100644
--- a/drivers/base/topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/topology.c
@@ -62,25 +62,6 @@ static ssize_t show_cpumap(int type, const struct cpumask *mask, char *buf)
}
#endif
-#ifdef arch_provides_topology_pointers
-#define define_siblings_show_map(name) \
-static ssize_t show_##name(struct device *dev, \
- struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
-{ \
- unsigned int cpu = dev->id; \
- return show_cpumap(0, topology_##name(cpu), buf); \
-}
-
-#define define_siblings_show_list(name) \
-static ssize_t show_##name##_list(struct device *dev, \
- struct device_attribute *attr, \
- char *buf) \
-{ \
- unsigned int cpu = dev->id; \
- return show_cpumap(1, topology_##name(cpu), buf); \
-}
-
-#else
#define define_siblings_show_map(name) \
static ssize_t show_##name(struct device *dev, \
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) \
@@ -95,7 +76,6 @@ static ssize_t show_##name##_list(struct device *dev, \
{ \
return show_cpumap(1, topology_##name(dev->id), buf); \
}
-#endif
#define define_siblings_show_func(name) \
define_siblings_show_map(name); define_siblings_show_list(name)
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists