[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51F41FA0.6060205@parallels.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 23:29:36 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
CC: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Save soft-dirty bits on file pages
On 07/27/2013 12:55 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
>> Andy reported that if file page get reclaimed we loose soft-dirty bit
>> if it was there, so save _PAGE_BIT_SOFT_DIRTY bit when page address
>> get encoded into pte entry. Thus when #pf happens on such non-present
>> pte we can restore it back.
>>
>
> Unless I'm misunderstanding this, it's saving the bit in the
> non-present PTE. This sounds wrong -- what happens if the entire pmd
> (or whatever the next level is called) gets zapped? (Also, what
> happens if you unmap a file and map a different file there?)
The whole pte gets zapped on vma unmap, and in this case forgetting
the soft-dirty bit completely is OK.
> --Andy
> .
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists